Jack and D-Bus

What other apps and distros do you use to round out your studio?

Moderators: MattKingUSA, khz

Post Reply
User avatar
funkmuscle
Established Member
Posts: 2984
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 2:30 pm
Has thanked: 194 times
Been thanked: 50 times

Jack and D-Bus

Post by funkmuscle »

I have no clue about this so I'm asking.. What is the purpose of Jack and D-Bus?
Do I need them working together?
Does it improve latency, etc??
studio32

Re: Jack and D-Bus

Post by studio32 »

Afaik jackdbus is an option in Jack2. You can build it with dbus enabled. You only want this if you want to work with Ladish (as I do). Jackdbus is not better or worse then classic Jack2 in performance. You can build both -classic and -dbus, they are in the same package, Jack2.

Search for threads about Ladi / ladish
SR
Established Member
Posts: 218
Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 6:01 pm
Location: Houston, Tx

Re: Jack and D-Bus

Post by SR »

I'm curious why it's not enabled by default in some distributions. Was there some controversy to it?
studio32

Re: Jack and D-Bus

Post by studio32 »

SR wrote:I'm curious why it's not enabled by default in some distributions. Was there some controversy to it?
Understatement ;)

Search the LAD archives on dbus, jackdbus, LADI.

I don't want to dive into it to deeply, I'm not a programmer, but a lot seems to be due to bad communication in the community. There might some myths flying around... Also Paul D. seems to be not a great fan of it and it seems that the community 'just' follows his opinion sometimes.. On the other hand, he has proven to know something ;)

So at the end, Ladi with jackdbus might not be the best session solution for everyone, but for a regular home studio desktop user it has proven to be useful already...

Also other devs like RUI from qjackctl, has accepted dbus support in qjackctl...

Let's see if it can kill the 'myths' around dbus... ;)
User avatar
funkmuscle
Established Member
Posts: 2984
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 2:30 pm
Has thanked: 194 times
Been thanked: 50 times

Re: Jack and D-Bus

Post by funkmuscle »

So at the end, Ladi with jackdbus might not be the best session solution for everyone, but for a regular home studio desktop user it has proven to be useful already...
I'm a regular home studio desktop user, how is it useful? I'm asking because Rui just updated jackctl with dbus support and I wondering if it's worth it to upgrade or not.
studio32

Re: Jack and D-Bus

Post by studio32 »

funkmuscle wrote:
So at the end, Ladi with jackdbus might not be the best session solution for everyone, but for a regular home studio desktop user it has proven to be useful already...
I'm a regular home studio desktop user, how is it useful? I'm asking because Rui just updated jackctl with dbus support and I wondering if it's worth it to upgrade or not.
It restores the applications I have launched in it, along with the jack connections. I can simply restart such a setup with ladish

If you use ladish, you probably don't use qjackctl, but ladish with laditools... On the other hand it is handy that such a core app also supports jackdbus now.
User avatar
funkmuscle
Established Member
Posts: 2984
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 2:30 pm
Has thanked: 194 times
Been thanked: 50 times

Re: Jack and D-Bus

Post by funkmuscle »

thanx studio for the info and help. Now I need to look at Ladi...
Post Reply