Re: Why does giving your music as a gift feel awkward? Should it?
Posted: Wed Dec 09, 2020 9:08 pm
I think that there can be no higher honor for a person than to receive a custom-made song that speaks to something unique within them. To know that you were the source of inspiration for a work of art is rare gift indeed. Most people will never know how that feels. Anyone who is not humbled by such a gift is a churl and a lout.
If you just took a bunch songs that you had already recorded and burned them to CD and gave it... it doesn't have the same impact, because it isn't tailored to the recipient. It isn't that the songs are not any good, it is just that the recipient was not the source of inspiration, and the gift just seems that much more arbitrary. You were not necessarily thinking of them specifically when you created those songs. In this way it really isn't that different than the tangible arts. If someone made me a cane, tailored it to my tastes, my height, my particular limp and gave it to me as a gift, it would mean more to me than if they just went into their wood shop and grabbed any old one they had on the rack.
If you gave a gift that was specifically tailored to that person, and had the balls to be vulnerable enough to share a piece of your soul -- then you should feel good about it (even if they are too crude or materialistic to appreciate it). If you did less than that... then maybe you have your answer
There is still nothing wrong with it, but I wouldn't expect anyone to melt.
There are many reasons I think that this vexes musicians. We tend to be an insecure lot to begin with... and music is not something easily quantified. You can look at a piece of jewelry, look at the purity of the gold, weight it... touch it, wear it... everyone can appreciate that. Music is more subjective, and indeed, most people don't know how to properly consume it anyway... so its value in the eyes of others can always be easily drawn into question. But my advice is... do not concern yourself with it. Keep writing. Keep playing. Keep recording. Keep creating. Rock on,
If you just took a bunch songs that you had already recorded and burned them to CD and gave it... it doesn't have the same impact, because it isn't tailored to the recipient. It isn't that the songs are not any good, it is just that the recipient was not the source of inspiration, and the gift just seems that much more arbitrary. You were not necessarily thinking of them specifically when you created those songs. In this way it really isn't that different than the tangible arts. If someone made me a cane, tailored it to my tastes, my height, my particular limp and gave it to me as a gift, it would mean more to me than if they just went into their wood shop and grabbed any old one they had on the rack.
If you gave a gift that was specifically tailored to that person, and had the balls to be vulnerable enough to share a piece of your soul -- then you should feel good about it (even if they are too crude or materialistic to appreciate it). If you did less than that... then maybe you have your answer
There are many reasons I think that this vexes musicians. We tend to be an insecure lot to begin with... and music is not something easily quantified. You can look at a piece of jewelry, look at the purity of the gold, weight it... touch it, wear it... everyone can appreciate that. Music is more subjective, and indeed, most people don't know how to properly consume it anyway... so its value in the eyes of others can always be easily drawn into question. But my advice is... do not concern yourself with it. Keep writing. Keep playing. Keep recording. Keep creating. Rock on,