I mean, you have to read the whole thing (which BTW takes more than 5 minutes) to find out about that ?
Really ?
That's a given right from the start, that models cannot be an exact thing. No need to go back to Greek philosophy and its influence to see that models, in the general sense, and it's enforcement upon existing conditions is more often than not, not the best way to proceed. Especially with flowing and movable aspects of reality such as biological processes.
So you can, hopefully, understand that I was not that much motivated to go all through the nitty gritty details of why. It has nothing to do with not being up to reading the whole thing as if this was an army training boot camp of some sort. Hopefully you can see the difference.
It's like reading 20 pages about why oranges have a vitamin C that's good for you, don't you find ? Sure, for someone who studies chemistry it can be interesting to know about the vitamin C molecules and their interactions in great details. And frankly, if I had the time for this it'd be interested. I already went through to some extent to fungi interaction when I was making natto, miso, amazake and 酒酿 at home.
Absolutely. A techno bubble. That description is totally unaware of it's uses. It is oblivious to it. While a model cannot be trusted, laws will be passed influenced by such a model, amplified in proper ways by the medias to unsuspecting populations who I can assure you, will not have the time to read the description you posted.
Should we refer to this as a starting point down the thread ? Hopefully not.
A discussion, an exchange of ideas and thoughts could now be down to the physical act of having spent (much more than 5 minutes) reading something that's obvious right from the start ?
However if your reaction was triggered by you having spent some time perusing the various links given here ... what's your take on those topics, preferably addressed with some specific elements ?