Hey guys, sorry I could not reply before
@Shimpe
You're welcome. Thank you for the details on Zyn; I'm a newcomer to it and sometimes it takes me some tweaking to avoid a certain 'Fisher Price' feel in my synth parts. I guess I have a lot to explore yet. For example, using effects through other programs via the power of Jack.
@Smeefer
Completely agree, the point of an event like this should be bringing together the linux audio people.
The podcast for me was a celebration of human creativity, and the power that these amazing FREE tools allows us, a power that a few decades ago was costly and reserved to an elite.
Sticking to the spirit of the podcast as much as possible, I think it would be nice to keep the rules to a bare minimum in order to allow as much people as possible in.The previous Tunestorms kept things very open (for example, "making a piece with sampled household items", how open is that?).
All of the possibilities you mention are very interesting and I can't wait to see what you come up with; but they sound to me more like the kind of 'rules' that stem from any creative process: the creator, knowing it or not, sets a series of impositions on himself, and then plays with them; the way in which he acknowledges, overcomes, ignores, rewrites, reverts or even violate them along the way, is what makes a piece interesting. (Of course this is highly subjective).
The baseline is: 'doing some stuff with open source programs'. And even that rule, if my memory serves me right, was allowed some partial exceptions in the Podcast.
Anyways, like Groucho said, 'these are my principles, and if you don't like them, I have others'...
@FalTX
I'm not sure music theory is even desirable; in my experience, sometimes it can even be a hurdle for creativity and experimentation.
Thanks btw for all your work, coming from a coding challenged person. I think, in your condition of 'toy maker', you're twice invited to play here...
