It appears that the Projucer has some flags enabled that require i7 CPUs, which is most likely the cause of the illegal instruction errors.
Source: https://forum.juce.com/t/linux-projucer ... up/18320/8
HISE
Moderators: MattKingUSA, khz
- d.healey
- Established Member
- Posts: 611
- Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2017 8:33 pm
- Has thanked: 278 times
- Been thanked: 101 times
Re: HISE
I asked Christoph about this on the HISE forum and this is his answer:
David Healey
YouTube - Free HISE scripting and sample library dev tutorials
Libre Wave - Freedom respecting instruments and effects.
YouTube - Free HISE scripting and sample library dev tutorials
Libre Wave - Freedom respecting instruments and effects.
-
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2018 6:31 am
Re: HISE
I have changed the flag and replaced the Projucer binary. Can anyone that has the issue try again? I can‘t test it because I only have i7 CPUs
- GMaq
- Established Member
- Posts: 2822
- Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 1:42 pm
- Has thanked: 528 times
- Been thanked: 572 times
Re: HISE
Hi,ChristophHart wrote:I have changed the flag and replaced the Projucer binary. Can anyone that has the issue try again? I can‘t test it because I only have i7 CPUs
First, Hise looks incredible! Thanks for your assistance and posting here..
I have an old early quad Intel Q6600 and a GIT pull with your changes unfortunately still doesn't produce a running binary for me.
Code: Select all
tester@avlinux64box:/media/DATA1/Packaging/HISE/HISE/tools/projucer$ ./Projucer
Illegal instruction
tester@avlinux64box:/media/DATA1/Packaging/HISE/HISE/tools/projucer$
- d.healey
- Established Member
- Posts: 611
- Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2017 8:33 pm
- Has thanked: 278 times
- Been thanked: 101 times
Re: HISE
Don't delete it from the repo, I don't want to have to build it those who want to build it can delete their local copyfalkTX wrote:why not just deleting the projucer binary from the repo, and let others build it?
there is a linux makefile for it...
David Healey
YouTube - Free HISE scripting and sample library dev tutorials
Libre Wave - Freedom respecting instruments and effects.
YouTube - Free HISE scripting and sample library dev tutorials
Libre Wave - Freedom respecting instruments and effects.
- GMaq
- Established Member
- Posts: 2822
- Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 1:42 pm
- Has thanked: 528 times
- Been thanked: 572 times
Re: HISE
Hi falkTX,falkTX wrote:why not just deleting the projucer binary from the repo, and let others build it?
there is a linux makefile for it...
I know next to nothing about JUCE, can Projucer just be built on it's own and if so can you point to the recommended GIT repo for building it on Linux? There seem to be a lot of JUCE related extensions and stuff and I'm not sure what's what?
I agree that having a Projucer binary in the Hise source with wider CPU compatibility is probably the best for many people, it is already a pretty daunting project to build even for intermediate Linux users..
- Michael Willis
- Established Member
- Posts: 1460
- Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2016 3:27 pm
- Location: Rocky Mountains, North America
- Has thanked: 71 times
- Been thanked: 169 times
- Contact:
Re: HISE
This is the very reason why I used DPF for my pluginGMaq wrote:it is already a pretty daunting project to build even for intermediate Linux users..
- GMaq
- Established Member
- Posts: 2822
- Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 1:42 pm
- Has thanked: 528 times
- Been thanked: 572 times
Re: HISE
Hi,
Thought I'd do a fresh GIT pull and revisit HISE, still no joy on the Projucer binary!? Is it not possible to build a more generic Projucer executable, it's not like I'm running some exotic weird processor here...
Thought I'd do a fresh GIT pull and revisit HISE, still no joy on the Projucer binary!? Is it not possible to build a more generic Projucer executable, it's not like I'm running some exotic weird processor here...