The most powerful music moguls at risk

[glowrak guy]

Lots of info here:

https://youtu.be/taFlulhWFh4

[sunrat]

No surprise. Big music has always been corrupt af. Hopefully some big names go down and get their reckoning. It won't change anything though, for every dirtbag exposed, there will be dozens waiting to fill their place in the cesspit. It's part of how capitalism works.

[asbak]

The first mogul they talk about has "Sir" and "CBE" in his titles.

What inevitably follows with titles like those are connections to banksters, warped aristocrats, pedo and groomer networks, spy rings, strange NGOs, slavery and human trafficking rings and much much more.

This is the way of these Round Table mafias who control most Western media, amongst other things.

Are these moguls really at risk?

The publicity will be unwelcome but I think the "risk" is debatable because these groups are connected to the very top and control entire societies and countries. In worst case scenarios (for them), one or two may face a rap across the knuckles to maintain the semblance of "justice is equal" but that's as far as it will go.

[glowrak guy]

Diddy lost both his bail hearing, and the appeal, and is currently in one of the worst hell-hole prisons in America. Maybe he can trade for an extra mattress and a makeshift pillow. Epsteins chic served time there, and was not a happy camper. Neither was R Kelly, and numerous other entertainment world convicts. The suicide-watch is rumored to be active, in case Diddy get's the Epstein itch to visit other worlds.

[tseaver]

@asback

The first mogul they talk about has "Sir" and "CBE" in his titles.

What inevitably follows with titles like those are connections to banksters, warped aristocrats, pedo and groomer networks, spy rings, strange NGOs, slavery and human trafficking rings and much much more.

Ummm, that generalization isn't just a blanket, it is a shag carpet big enough for the huge-stadium-of-your-choice.

While there are certainly examples of such individuals, tarring everybody ever named on the Honours List with that brush is too much.

[asbak]

Ummm, that generalization isn't just a blanket, it is a shag carpet big enough for the huge-stadium-of-your-choice.

While there are certainly examples of such individuals, tarring everybody ever named on the Honours List with that brush is too much.

"Individuals", that's a funny one because it's practically institutionalised. Have you even bothered to look up just how many of them have had their honours revoked over the years after getting exposed for noncing?

PS: It wasn't the noncing that got them into trouble because after all that's how the system ensures their compliance. It was the getting caught at it and exposed that dunnit.

Characters like Saville were known about by everybody in the know for decades. Don't tell me that "nobody knew" and that he miraculously fooled the background checks when he got his OBE. Find another mug to sell that story to.

But believe what you want buddy