Standard test needed to benchmark XRUNs

Optimize your system for ultimate performance.

Moderators: MattKingUSA, khz

User avatar
lilith
Established Member
Posts: 1355
Joined: Fri May 27, 2016 11:41 pm
Location: bLACK fOREST
Contact:

Re: Standard test needed to benchmark XRUNs

Post by lilith »

merlyn wrote:What does

Code: Select all

grep threadirqs /proc/cmdline
say?
Just tried and it says nothing at all :(

merlyn
Established Member
Posts: 640
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 4:13 pm

Re: Standard test needed to benchmark XRUNs

Post by merlyn »

You don't have threadirqs loaded.

You need to edit /etc/default/grub as root.

Add 'threadirqs' without quotes to the line GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX.

Then generate a new grub.cfg with

Code: Select all

grub-mkconfig -o /boot/grub/grub.cfg
I think that should work on Debian.

gimmeapill
Established Member
Posts: 546
Joined: Thu Mar 12, 2015 8:41 am

Re: Standard test needed to benchmark XRUNs

Post by gimmeapill »

As merlyn said.
If you don't have irq threading activated, all bets are off.

Regarding that graphic issue: why don't you just boot avlinux from usb and try the renoise demo from there? This should at least tell you if it's a hardware issue or not.
You have a working debian system, you shouldn't need to reinstall anything - if it's a software issue, it can probably get fixed.

User avatar
lilith
Established Member
Posts: 1355
Joined: Fri May 27, 2016 11:41 pm
Location: bLACK fOREST
Contact:

Re: Standard test needed to benchmark XRUNs

Post by lilith »

merlyn wrote:You don't have threadirqs loaded.

You need to edit /etc/default/grub as root.

Add 'threadirqs' without quotes to the line GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX.

Then generate a new grub.cfg with

Code: Select all

grub-mkconfig -o /boot/grub/grub.cfg
I think that should work on Debian.
Hi,

ok, I'll try that, but I think it must look like:

Code: Select all

GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX_DEFAULT="quiet threadirqs"
GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX=""
right?

User avatar
lilith
Established Member
Posts: 1355
Joined: Fri May 27, 2016 11:41 pm
Location: bLACK fOREST
Contact:

Re: Standard test needed to benchmark XRUNs

Post by lilith »

gimmeapill wrote:As merlyn said.
If you don't have irq threading activated, all bets are off.

Regarding that graphic issue: why don't you just boot avlinux from usb and try the renoise demo from there? This should at least tell you if it's a hardware issue or not.
You have a working debian system, you shouldn't need to reinstall anything - if it's a software issue, it can probably get fixed.
I tried the MXLinux Stick I have and got no issues there in Renoise, but it's using MESA 18 instead of MESA 13. I'll try the AVLinux again also... Just need to make a live stick, which is always a struggle for AVLinux.

gimmeapill
Established Member
Posts: 546
Joined: Thu Mar 12, 2015 8:41 am

Re: Standard test needed to benchmark XRUNs

Post by gimmeapill »

Ok, so: no HW issue and MX linux is supposed to be based on debian stable = you can very likely skip the avlinux step.
-> before jumping on debian testing for the newer mesa, it could still be worth installing another window manager, select it from the lightdm greeter and see how things go with Renoise...

User avatar
lilith
Established Member
Posts: 1355
Joined: Fri May 27, 2016 11:41 pm
Location: bLACK fOREST
Contact:

Re: Standard test needed to benchmark XRUNs

Post by lilith »

Now it's working:

Code: Select all

marco@fox:~$ grep threadirqs /proc/cmdline
BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-4.9.0-9-amd64 root=UUID=8ea536dc-6928-4da9-a747-2fa60cf3d097 ro quiet threadirqs

User avatar
lilith
Established Member
Posts: 1355
Joined: Fri May 27, 2016 11:41 pm
Location: bLACK fOREST
Contact:

Re: Standard test needed to benchmark XRUNs

Post by lilith »

gimmeapill wrote:Ok, so: no HW issue and MX linux is supposed to be based on debian stable = you can very likely skip the avlinux step.
-> before jumping on debian testing for the newer mesa, it could still be worth installing another window manager, select it from the lightdm greeter and see how things go with Renoise...
I have to look first how to do that. Do I have to uninstall XFCE first or can I also make it temporary?

User avatar
khz
Established Member
Posts: 1365
Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2008 6:29 am
Location: German

Re: Standard test needed to benchmark XRUNs

Post by khz »

https://packages.debian.org/stretch/awesome

Code: Select all

apt-get install awesome
Super that there is no hardware problem ... is.
You can install multiple window managers in parallel.
A minimal window manager does not have so many dependencies (software/services).
If you want to install a large window manager, which has more dependencies, take tasksel. https://packages.debian.org/stretch/tasksel Installing multiple large window managers in parallel can mean a lot of software/services.
FZ - Does humor belongs in Music?
GNU/LINUX@AUDIO ~ /Wiki $ Howto.Info && GNU/Linux Debian installing >> Linux Audio Workstation LAW
  • I don't care about the freedom of speech because I have nothing to say.

User avatar
lilith
Established Member
Posts: 1355
Joined: Fri May 27, 2016 11:41 pm
Location: bLACK fOREST
Contact:

Re: Standard test needed to benchmark XRUNs

Post by lilith »

I´ ll try this:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=247Y6nh93I4

Or do I need anything else beside of awesome? For instance any additional menus?

User avatar
khz
Established Member
Posts: 1365
Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2008 6:29 am
Location: German

Re: Standard test needed to benchmark XRUNs

Post by khz »

ArcoLinuxD (ArchMergeD) - Installing Awesome Window Manager https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M7KKPqrJ5co ;-)
<EDIT>Obscure Window Manager Project - Awesome WM https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vAh05O43JmE better</EDIT>
FZ - Does humor belongs in Music?
GNU/LINUX@AUDIO ~ /Wiki $ Howto.Info && GNU/Linux Debian installing >> Linux Audio Workstation LAW
  • I don't care about the freedom of speech because I have nothing to say.

User avatar
lilith
Established Member
Posts: 1355
Joined: Fri May 27, 2016 11:41 pm
Location: bLACK fOREST
Contact:

Re: Standard test needed to benchmark XRUNs

Post by lilith »

khz wrote:ArcoLinuxD (ArchMergeD) - Installing Awesome Window Manager https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M7KKPqrJ5co ;-)
I did and now I feel like a hacker :lol:

User avatar
khz
Established Member
Posts: 1365
Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2008 6:29 am
Location: German

Re: Standard test needed to benchmark XRUNs

Post by khz »

Pick a window manager. :-D
Welcome to my guide to window managers and desktop environments for The X Window System, as used mainly by Linux and UNIX operating systems. Here you will find descriptions, screenshots and configuration files for all popular window managers, along with related resources, including a news and discussion area. Simply click on the appropriate links on the left, or below.
http://www.xwinman.org/
FZ - Does humor belongs in Music?
GNU/LINUX@AUDIO ~ /Wiki $ Howto.Info && GNU/Linux Debian installing >> Linux Audio Workstation LAW
  • I don't care about the freedom of speech because I have nothing to say.

User avatar
lilith
Established Member
Posts: 1355
Joined: Fri May 27, 2016 11:41 pm
Location: bLACK fOREST
Contact:

Re: Standard test needed to benchmark XRUNs

Post by lilith »

The Renoise problem with high CPU load does not occur with AWESOME. I guess it uses another kind of compositing. On the other hand still get xruns with my "large" Reaper project.

I thought it´ s much more complicated to install window managers. Will try some more :)

User avatar
lilith
Established Member
Posts: 1355
Joined: Fri May 27, 2016 11:41 pm
Location: bLACK fOREST
Contact:

Re: Standard test needed to benchmark XRUNs

Post by lilith »

With openbox I get the Renoise issue with Compton and without compton. And even more funny, only when the Renoise window is maximized. When there´ s a small frame of the desktop left it works.

Post Reply