I don't see any significant difference between your usbmon capture and mine, except when yours fails and mine gets a response, although interestingly your capture has error -2 (ENOENT) instead of -110 (ETIMEDOUT) like before:Jorin wrote:Outputs here: https://gist.github.com/jorins/46bce342 ... 2feacd7243geoffrey wrote: [...]
[...]
Code: Select all
ffff969fb4880300 1865259336 S Co:3:009:0 s 21 02 0000 0005 0010 16 = 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
ffff969fb4880300 1865259448 C Co:3:009:0 0 16 >
ffff969fb4880300 1865259454 S Ci:3:009:0 s a1 03 0000 0005 0010 16 <
ffff969fb4880300 1870412618 C Ci:3:009:0 -2 0
Code: Select all
ffff967c9361b0c0 933637178 S Co:092:00 s 21 02 0000 0005 0010 16 = 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
ffff967c9361b0c0 933637197 C Co:092:00 0 16 >
ffff967c9361b0c0 933637204 S Ci:092:00 s a1 03 0000 0005 0010 16 <
ffff967c9361b0c0 933637238 C Ci:092:00 0 16 = 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
Any chance you can capture the same while booting a Windows VM with the Focusrite driver so we can see what happens differently with that?