Do you have an interface that works best with 48000 instead of 44100?

Talk about your MIDI interfaces, microphones, keyboards...

Moderators: MattKingUSA, khz

Post Reply
User avatar
bluebell
Established Member
Posts: 1923
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2012 11:44 am
Location: Saarland, Germany
Has thanked: 112 times
Been thanked: 119 times

Do you have an interface that works best with 48000 instead of 44100?

Post by bluebell »

This is no discussion of 48000 vs. 96000 vs. 192000 and so on but the question if some audio interfaces work better with 48000 than with 44100.

With my Focusrite Scarlett USB interfaces (Solo, 2i2, 2i4) I noticed that I can run them at 44100 with a buffer size of 64 without xruns. But at 48000 I can go down to 32 or even 24(!) on an old Core i5-2500T. I have not even a realtime kernel but a lowlatency kernel.

Additionally, when I run them at 44100 then I have some occasional clicks (about 1 per minute) that sound as if caused by a light switch or a refrigerator that starts cooling. No clicks when running them at 48000.

So it seems that there are some native and some non-native modes when running audio interfaces. Possible causes:
- Interfaces' firmware
- Internal ALSA structures
- Undocumented commands needed to prepare an interface for 44100

Do you have any interfaces where you observe similar effects? Only with Linux? Or maybe with Mac or Windows, too?

Linux – MOTU UltraLite AVB – Qtractor – http://suedwestlicht.saar.de/

Jack Winter
Established Member
Posts: 381
Joined: Sun May 28, 2017 3:52 pm

Re: Do you have an interface that works best with 48000 instead of 44100?

Post by Jack Winter »

AFAIK that is a possibility with more than one card.
Reaper/KDE/Archlinux. i7-2600k/16GB + i7-4700HQ/16GB, RME Multiface/Babyface, Behringer X32, WA273-EQ, 2 x WA-412, ADL-600, Tegeler TRC, etc 8) For REAPER on Linux information: https://wiki.cockos.com/wiki/index.php/REAPER_for_Linux
User avatar
bluebell
Established Member
Posts: 1923
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2012 11:44 am
Location: Saarland, Germany
Has thanked: 112 times
Been thanked: 119 times

Re: Do you have an interface that works best with 48000 instead of 44100?

Post by bluebell »

Jack Winter wrote:AFAIK that is a possibility with more than one card.
It happens with a single interface connected to the PC as well.

Linux – MOTU UltraLite AVB – Qtractor – http://suedwestlicht.saar.de/

User avatar
Michael Willis
Established Member
Posts: 1458
Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2016 3:27 pm
Location: Rocky Mountains, North America
Has thanked: 70 times
Been thanked: 166 times
Contact:

Re: Do you have an interface that works best with 48000 instead of 44100?

Post by Michael Willis »

You are possibly already aware of this, and I'm not even sure how relevant it is anymore, but this document seems to indicate that 48000 may be inherently better for some USB interfaces:

https://wiki.linuxaudio.org/wiki/list_o ... _interface

I have the first generation 2i4. After reading this, I use a sample rate of 48000 with periods/buffer set to 3, and the buffer size depends on how cpu intensive my project is. My cpu is older than your i5. If I'm recording a single virtual instrument or audio track, I can get away with a buffer size of 64, but if I'm doing a large project in a heavyweight DAW with dozens of tracks, multiple instances of LinuxSampler, and a handful of reverb busses, the buffer size has to be 256. That includes running a realtime kernel from AVLinux and turning off my wifi.
Jack Winter
Established Member
Posts: 381
Joined: Sun May 28, 2017 3:52 pm

Re: Do you have an interface that works best with 48000 instead of 44100?

Post by Jack Winter »

bluebell wrote:It happens with a single interface connected to the PC as well.
What I meant is that I've heard about this happening with different cards. Never experienced it myself.
Reaper/KDE/Archlinux. i7-2600k/16GB + i7-4700HQ/16GB, RME Multiface/Babyface, Behringer X32, WA273-EQ, 2 x WA-412, ADL-600, Tegeler TRC, etc 8) For REAPER on Linux information: https://wiki.cockos.com/wiki/index.php/REAPER_for_Linux
User avatar
English Guy
Established Member
Posts: 525
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2012 7:28 pm
Location: England
Has thanked: 8 times
Been thanked: 7 times

Re: Do you have an interface that works best with 48000 instead of 44100?

Post by English Guy »

I have an alesis io2. It is hard wired at 48000. If it was run at 44000 it would be constantly converting
puleglot
Established Member
Posts: 135
Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2020 3:14 pm
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 13 times

Re: Do you have an interface that works best with 48000 instead of 44100?

Post by puleglot »

bluebell wrote: Sat Aug 11, 2018 10:02 am With my Focusrite Scarlett USB interfaces (Solo, 2i2, 2i4) ...

Additionally, when I run them at 44100 then I have some occasional clicks (about 1 per minute) that sound as if caused by a light switch or a refrigerator that starts cooling. No clicks when running them at 48000.
Are all of these 2nd gen? If yes, then you indeed hit the kernel bug. Solo was fixed last year [1], 2i2 and 2i4 will be fixed in 5.7 [2,3]. Explanation of the bug is in the last commit.

[1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/ke ... 250db5d0e5
[2] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/ke ... 032dabf2e4
[3] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/ke ... 20b7eaaf60
User avatar
bluebell
Established Member
Posts: 1923
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2012 11:44 am
Location: Saarland, Germany
Has thanked: 112 times
Been thanked: 119 times

Re: Do you have an interface that works best with 48000 instead of 44100?

Post by bluebell »

1st and 2nd gen. Thanks for the info. Since then I stay with 48 kHz and everything is running ok.

Linux – MOTU UltraLite AVB – Qtractor – http://suedwestlicht.saar.de/

Post Reply