HISE

Link to good samples/soundfonts at http://wiki.linuxaudio.org/wiki/free_audio_data

Moderators: MattKingUSA, khz

User avatar
d.healey
Established Member
Posts: 229
Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2017 8:33 pm

Re: HISE

Post by d.healey »

I asked Christoph about this on the HISE forum and this is his answer:

It appears that the Projucer has some flags enabled that require i7 CPUs, which is most likely the cause of the illegal instruction errors.

Source: https://forum.juce.com/t/linux-projucer ... up/18320/8
David Healey
Patreon - HISE scripting and sample library dev tutorials
Libre Wave - Freedom respecting instruments and effects.

ChristophHart
Posts: 1
Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2018 6:31 am

Re: HISE

Post by ChristophHart »

I have changed the flag and replaced the Projucer binary. Can anyone that has the issue try again? I can‘t test it because I only have i7 CPUs ;)

User avatar
GMaq
Established Member
Posts: 1641
Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 1:42 pm

Re: HISE

Post by GMaq »

ChristophHart wrote:I have changed the flag and replaced the Projucer binary. Can anyone that has the issue try again? I can‘t test it because I only have i7 CPUs ;)
Hi,

First, Hise looks incredible! Thanks for your assistance and posting here..

I have an old early quad Intel Q6600 and a GIT pull with your changes unfortunately still doesn't produce a running binary for me.

Code: Select all

tester@avlinux64box:/media/DATA1/Packaging/HISE/HISE/tools/projucer$ ./Projucer
Illegal instruction
tester@avlinux64box:/media/DATA1/Packaging/HISE/HISE/tools/projucer$ 
To be extra sure I deleted my existing local repo and did a fresh GIT clone with no change.

User avatar
d.healey
Established Member
Posts: 229
Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2017 8:33 pm

Re: HISE

Post by d.healey »

falkTX wrote:why not just deleting the projucer binary from the repo, and let others build it?
there is a linux makefile for it...
Don't delete it from the repo, I don't want to have to build it :) those who want to build it can delete their local copy
David Healey
Patreon - HISE scripting and sample library dev tutorials
Libre Wave - Freedom respecting instruments and effects.

User avatar
GMaq
Established Member
Posts: 1641
Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 1:42 pm

Re: HISE

Post by GMaq »

falkTX wrote:why not just deleting the projucer binary from the repo, and let others build it?
there is a linux makefile for it...
Hi falkTX,

I know next to nothing about JUCE, can Projucer just be built on it's own and if so can you point to the recommended GIT repo for building it on Linux? There seem to be a lot of JUCE related extensions and stuff and I'm not sure what's what?

I agree that having a Projucer binary in the Hise source with wider CPU compatibility is probably the best for many people, it is already a pretty daunting project to build even for intermediate Linux users..

User avatar
Michael Willis
Established Member
Posts: 1020
Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2016 3:27 pm
Location: Rocky Mountains, North America
Contact:

Re: HISE

Post by Michael Willis »

GMaq wrote:it is already a pretty daunting project to build even for intermediate Linux users..
This is the very reason why I used DPF for my plugin :wink:

User avatar
GMaq
Established Member
Posts: 1641
Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 1:42 pm

Re: HISE

Post by GMaq »

Hi,

Thought I'd do a fresh GIT pull and revisit HISE, still no joy on the Projucer binary!? Is it not possible to build a more generic Projucer executable, it's not like I'm running some exotic weird processor here...

Post Reply