Honestly, I think we're most likely going to get the Linux versions from developers that either like using Linux themselves (on dual-boot machines etc.) or just like the idea of Linux and alternative ways of doing things (Chris Randall of Audio Damage has a long history of doing alternative music). We're less likely going to get Linux versions from companies whose business model is based on selling their products to commercial studios - or to bedroom studio producers who think that getting the same stuff that's used in the studios will help them reach the same production standards.
I'm glad that we have plugins from well-known companies like u-he, TAL, Audio Damage available on Linux, even if the plugins are typically described as "beta". I'm perfectly fine with that approach personally, knowing how different the distros can be and how much it poses challenges, as long as the developers aren't putting completely non-functional stuff out there.
) done first. (there's quite a 