42low wrote:tramp wrote:42low wrote:Even if the core recording is 48khz then editing and mastering at around 90khz gives better results
Nobody will use 90kHz. It's 96kHz, what is to be expected. Your argumentations comes with the same correctness.
That correctness is more about you (r reading).
I said AROUND 90khz all the time. As this 90khz is what came out of research (not by me).
Don't try to burn medown on words i neversaid but came from (in this case your) missreading.
This 90khz is NOT comming from me! Is NOT invented by me or neither came from any thought off me.
To work AROUND 90khz you can choose for 96khz or 88khz. Both AROUND 90khz.
My personal choise is 96khz.
My words are correct. Read them correct. And after that react correct to me instead off this kind off bullshit because it's clear for a while that you don't like me. Still don't know what i did wrong with you, but whatever, shit happens.
It would be more chique though if you kept distance from me exactly like i try to keep from you to avoid any conflict. Please help me to keep it pleasant on this forum for all.
Ok? Deal?
To make that clear, I've no personal feelings about you.
Sorry, that you get the impression.
What I wrote was about the correctness in your stances.
42low wrote:Even if the core recording is 48khz then editing and mastering at around 90khz gives better results. Perhaps not even directly hearable, but at least to be unconsciously experienced. That's a fact, . . .
That may be your opinion, even possible that you experience such results, but it is far from being a fact.
Once you've recorded at 48kHz, all frequencies out of the audible range been lost already, you can't recover them by up-sampling. That, is what I call a fact.
As long you only apply linear filters, you wont benefit from up-sampling, and that, is as well a fact, which you could measure and calculate by the plain math behind it.
What you wrote hear sounds to me like snake oil.
I'm very well know the benefits of higher sample rates, and use them when needed, but, that ain't mean that higher sample rates been ultimate better. It depend on the project you work on, and the filters you plan to apply.
On the road again.