Ubuntu PPA for *all* Linux Multimedia stuff
Moderators: raboof, MattKingUSA, khz
Re: Ubuntu PPA for *all* Linux Multimedia stuff
Great work so far
Some suggestions for more packages:
Dino (MIDI Sequencer) http://dino.nongnu.org/
SoftWerk (MIDI Pattern Sequencer) http://sourceforge.net/projects/softwerk/
Some suggestions for more packages:
Dino (MIDI Sequencer) http://dino.nongnu.org/
SoftWerk (MIDI Pattern Sequencer) http://sourceforge.net/projects/softwerk/
Re: Ubuntu PPA for *all* Linux Multimedia stuff
Why do you build (against) Lash? Imo Ladish is far more useful atm and it can conflict with Lash. I did not dive in this issue to deeply though...
More packages:
Non-mixer
More packages:
Non-mixer
Last edited by studio32 on Mon Mar 01, 2010 11:59 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Ubuntu PPA for *all* Linux Multimedia stuff
The name gladish is already in use by the ladish project.falkTX wrote:I try to use both. But most of the apss don't support ladish yet, so lash has to be used.studio32 wrote:Why do you build (against) Lash? Imo Ladish is far more useful atm and it can conflict with Lash.
In fact, one of the goals of ladish is to provide a compatibility library for lash-only apps, so it could be useful in the future.
PS: I'm also developing a tool similar to gLadish, some sort of "Audio Instruments/Effects manager".
Are lv2rack and non-mixer not such audio instruments/ effect managers already?
AFAIk Lv2rack is 'searching' for another (new) maintainer. Ask Nedko about it.
Re: Ubuntu PPA for *all* Linux Multimedia stuff
Then I would suggest to make an QT version of those applications and not discover the wheel again, cause that's not pushing the quality of linux audio most of the times imho. Also as a programmer of Linux audio software, you should take the (LAU and LAD) community in account and you can learn a lot from them and they from you maybe.falkTX wrote:LV2Rack, ZynJackU, gLadish... all of them use Gtk (which I don't like).
That's one of the main reasons I want to do my own app (and also to learn more about programing).
Not sure if it will be useful or not, but at least I keep learning new stuff
edit: Your ppa doesn't contain normal ardour? Would be nice if it is possible to install both ardour2 and ardourvst.
Re: Ubuntu PPA for *all* Linux Multimedia stuff
You can learn from interaction, don't wait for itfalkTX wrote: Thanks for the info, but, honestly, I don't think of myself as a good programmer; I still have a lot to learn before interaction and code-sharing. In a couple of months this may change though.
BTW, there is an bug in your package improvisor, I think it's name is impro-visor not improvisor. Which is important cause improvisor is an fork actually of impro-visor...
Re: Ubuntu PPA for *all* Linux Multimedia stuff
The Vst plugins in you repo, can those be use with/ in LMMS?
Re: Ubuntu PPA for *all* Linux Multimedia stuff
suggestions:
non-mixer http://non-mixer.tuxfamily.org/ (it is in the non-daw git repo...)
autotalent http://web.mit.edu/tbaran/www/autotalent.html
WAH-plugins http://www.kokkinizita.net/linuxaudio/d ... index.html (excellent wahwah effect for guitar)
Ingen http://drobilla.net/software/ingen/
PHASEX http://www.sysex.net/phasex/ http://git.debian.org/git/pkg-multimedia/phasex.git/
non-mixer http://non-mixer.tuxfamily.org/ (it is in the non-daw git repo...)
autotalent http://web.mit.edu/tbaran/www/autotalent.html
WAH-plugins http://www.kokkinizita.net/linuxaudio/d ... index.html (excellent wahwah effect for guitar)
Ingen http://drobilla.net/software/ingen/
PHASEX http://www.sysex.net/phasex/ http://git.debian.org/git/pkg-multimedia/phasex.git/
Re: Ubuntu PPA for *all* Linux Multimedia stuff
nice nice!
I think i miss the latest hydrogen
latest a2jmidi
latest rosegarden QT4
edit: there are bugs in your ladish packages, wrong upstream author!
Also laditools rc1 is quite obsolete...
Are you sure ladish is an dependency for Bristol? I would say a 'suggests' .
Can you tell me what impro-visor does? Where are the files installed and how can I start it?
How do you make sure that packages will be updated when an official ubuntu package is the same version?
For that you need to use ~ppa , but you use +ppa a lot. ~ppa is making a version number less, +ppa is making the version of an package higher AFAIK.
I think i miss the latest hydrogen
latest a2jmidi
latest rosegarden QT4
edit: there are bugs in your ladish packages, wrong upstream author!
Also laditools rc1 is quite obsolete...
Are you sure ladish is an dependency for Bristol? I would say a 'suggests' .
Can you tell me what impro-visor does? Where are the files installed and how can I start it?
How do you make sure that packages will be updated when an official ubuntu package is the same version?
For that you need to use ~ppa , but you use +ppa a lot. ~ppa is making a version number less, +ppa is making the version of an package higher AFAIK.
- autostatic
- Established Member
- Posts: 1994
- Joined: Wed Dec 09, 2009 5:26 pm
- Location: Beverwijk, The Netherlands
- Has thanked: 32 times
- Been thanked: 104 times
- Contact:
Re: Ubuntu PPA for *all* Linux Multimedia stuff
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pzz2fZ5OOaAfalkTX wrote:If you check the 'debian' folder, in many of the packages, they have wrong copyrights and stuff like that.
I only care about making it build and run fine, the rest (who packaged it, license, and other small stuff) I don't really care.
Re: Ubuntu PPA for *all* Linux Multimedia stuff
Hey,
Do you have qtractor build with VST support, like jost has VST support? It seems it's also needed for native VST support.
Do you have qtractor build with VST support, like jost has VST support? It seems it's also needed for native VST support.
Re: Ubuntu PPA for *all* Linux Multimedia stuff
I was looking for the download on this and saw it wasn't there. Are you still working on this please?
Re: Ubuntu PPA for *all* Linux Multimedia stuff
nicefalkTX wrote:I'm currently working on that.studio32 wrote:Hey,
Do you have qtractor build with VST support, like jost has VST support? It seems it's also needed for native VST support.
Yeah I was wondering about those lib32 packages. Are they replacing other packages on Ubuntu? Are they conflicting with packages?
If you check the ppa now, you'll see a lot of "lib32..." packages.
Since all Linux VSTs out there are 32bit, we'll need a 32bit host to run the VSTs;
I'm currently packaging "kde4-libs-32bit" for 64bit, so that the Oxygen and QtCurve style can be used while running a 32bit QTractor in 64bit PCs (otherwise it would use plastique style, which I don't like much).
Once the kde4 libs are build, I'll upload QTractor with VST support (32bit only, but functional in 64bit too)
Re: Ubuntu PPA for *all* Linux Multimedia stuff
git://repo.or.cz/libflashsupport-jack.git
I tried some vst plugins, but I doubt if they add something extra to the dssi/ladspa/lv2 plugins...
I tried some vst plugins, but I doubt if they add something extra to the dssi/ladspa/lv2 plugins...