Please show me where that was said, anywhere in the thread.42low wrote: Altruïsm is tupid, as also said.
Edit: don't bother, this is absolute nonsense.
Moderators: raboof, MattKingUSA, khz
Please show me where that was said, anywhere in the thread.42low wrote: Altruïsm is tupid, as also said.
No, you twisted my words, it is as simple as that. No where in the thread have I said that but yet there is in your post.42low wrote:Teasing. Quote as defence. And then later twist that "it isn't said". How obvious.sysrqer wrote:Please show me where that was said, anywhere in the thread.42low wrote: Altruïsm is tupid, as also said.
Suit yourself mate. Seems quite obvious who the troll is when they can't have a conversation with a single person on this board.42low wrote: Asking myself, isn't that part of the definition off trolling?
You're already on my ignore list for a while as you only start shitty discussions and not that often are altruïstic as you yourself confirm by discussing against it, not the first time. How obvious
Funny, all you ever post about is how much of a victim you are and how unfair everything is.42low wrote: What made you like that?
I for a long time was at active at levels were egoism is rather common, and altruism was much less common. Even that didn't pull me down but even confirmed me egoism is something really bad. Although i had reasons enough to become negative, but i didn't because negativity will eventually eat you.
So i advice you and everyone. Simply stop being negative, and start to be real nice to people. You'll experience it will benefit you (and that otherone) very quickly.
It's really is that simple and easy.
I'm not sure I follow, either, but I don't have any formal education in music theory or sound engineering... I used an oscilloscope once or twice as an electronics hobbyist... and... what were we talking about? I think I'll get back to writing music and developing my reverb plugin now.lilith wrote:To be honest I didn't get the point of all of this.
Sounds reasonable.Jack Winter wrote:then please do so in ONE post and then let it go...
my concern is that governments use fallacy "nothing to hide, nothing to fear" as pretext for snooping42low wrote:... topic is disappeared?? Vanished??
Why? Is it forbidden to ask for educational skills and knowledge level for weighing reliability of information? Is there something to hide?
Doctors needs studies to tell us that eating a apple a day is good for you.42low wrote:... topic is disappeared?? Vanished?? Why? Is it forbidden to ask for educational skills and knowledge level for weighing reliability of information?
And the use of that word and the tone you use are meant to set a pleasant atmosphere ?42low wrote: Too me too. Go tell it the fuckers who now and before react unpleasant on an ontopic reaction and set the unpleasant atmosphere.
They can do it. And companies can sell Cheez Whiz as if it were food. This is the world we live in where liberty prevails. The problem is the reception at the other end. People actually buying Cheez Whiz and in the former case people not realizing that if they adopt a "nothing to hide" attitude they are in fact creating a major, unsettling, stress-generating unbalance since on the other side the government hide at will when it comes to business transactions, how the people's money is spent, etc, etc, etc.nikgnomicradio wrote:my concern is that governments use fallacy "nothing to hide, nothing to fear" as pretext for snooping
Let's see ... 6 hours difference. That makes it roughly 2:30am.42low wrote:Not me who set the atmosphere. Don't fals accuse me.jonetsu wrote:And the use of that word and the tone you use are meant to set a pleasant atmosphere ?42low wrote: Too me too. Go tell it the fuckers who now and before react unpleasant on an ontopic reaction and set the unpleasant atmosphere.
AGAIN!!! It wasn't me who started to communicate i a very unpleasant way. It's how the story got twisted around. And people who do so i call fuckers yeah.
I don't like when you spread lies consistently and defend them without any facts. I get annoyed at that.42low wrote:Again one who's on my ignore list who again is trying to put some oil on the fire.Lyberta wrote:Total bullshit. Most humans can't hear more than 20kHz. My hearing ends at about 17 kHz. So 40kHz sampling rate is enough to cover all of the human hearing.42low wrote:The adviced and proven best quality for the hearing is about 90 khz
How predictable each time the same ones turning up for "a fun rumble". It's starting to look as a wulf pack . 3 already shown up. That are still not all and i wonder if another on my "ignore list one" will jump in it. Predictable too?