Search found 55 matches
- Tue Dec 26, 2023 11:36 am
- Forum: Linux Music News
- Topic: Zrythm 1.0.0-beta.6.0.1 released
- Replies: 0
- Views: 53761
Zrythm 1.0.0-beta.6.0.1 released
Zrythm 1.0.0-beta.6.0.1 has been released! We have also migrated our infrastructure/repositories/bug trackers from SourceHut to our own GitLab instance ==== Screenshot ==== https://www.zrythm.org/static/images/screenshots/screenshot-20221015.png ==== Demo ==== JDFight - Power Over People: https://ww...
- Fri Jun 09, 2023 1:01 am
- Forum: Recorders & Sequencers
- Topic: Z-curious... anybody using Zrythm for actual production?
- Replies: 80
- Views: 29816
- Thu Mar 24, 2022 8:05 pm
- Forum: Recorders & Sequencers
- Topic: Z-curious... anybody using Zrythm for actual production?
- Replies: 80
- Views: 29816
- Thu Mar 24, 2022 4:28 pm
- Forum: Recorders & Sequencers
- Topic: Z-curious... anybody using Zrythm for actual production?
- Replies: 80
- Views: 29816
Re: Z-curious... anybody using Zrythm for actual production?
For me Pipewire is not a current reality it is still a future possibility (in a Distribution sense) so perhaps once it is fully baked and all Distros come with it by default we will look back on this thread and chuckle about how silly it was.. :D I have been using PipeWire only for many months (may...
- Thu Mar 24, 2022 3:48 pm
- Forum: Recorders & Sequencers
- Topic: Z-curious... anybody using Zrythm for actual production?
- Replies: 80
- Views: 29816
Re: Z-curious... anybody using Zrythm for actual production?
You're misunderstanding. Of course it is possible for an application to use ALSA. The issue is that for an application to do that, it requires reimplementing what JACK does inside of the application. This is pointless because JACK and Pipewire already do it and present a simpler API for application...
- Thu Mar 24, 2022 6:33 am
- Forum: Recorders & Sequencers
- Topic: Z-curious... anybody using Zrythm for actual production?
- Replies: 80
- Views: 29816
Re: Z-curious... anybody using Zrythm for actual production?
ALSA is unusable as-is because it doesn't have an API usable by apps like DAWs. It's a very low level API intended for things like JACK and PipeWire. In the context of a DAW, you have to make it work by implementing it the way JACK does and there is no point doing that when JACK already does that. J...
- Wed Mar 23, 2022 9:34 pm
- Forum: Recorders & Sequencers
- Topic: Z-curious... anybody using Zrythm for actual production?
- Replies: 80
- Views: 29816
Re: Z-curious... anybody using Zrythm for actual production?
@GMaq just released beta 1.1.11. deb package should be fixed now Hi, and thanks for the fix! Some progress but still some problems.. With the latest 1.1.11 update the zrythm Debian 11 package does launch and go through it's setup now however once the main window opens after a couple of clicks it st...
- Wed Mar 23, 2022 4:40 pm
- Forum: Recorders & Sequencers
- Topic: Z-curious... anybody using Zrythm for actual production?
- Replies: 80
- Views: 29816
Re: Z-curious... anybody using Zrythm for actual production?
@GMaq just released beta 1.1.11. deb package should be fixed now
- Wed Mar 23, 2022 8:51 am
- Forum: Recorders & Sequencers
- Topic: Z-curious... anybody using Zrythm for actual production?
- Replies: 80
- Views: 29816
- Wed Mar 23, 2022 8:49 am
- Forum: Recorders & Sequencers
- Topic: Z-curious... anybody using Zrythm for actual production?
- Replies: 80
- Views: 29816
Re: Z-curious... anybody using Zrythm for actual production?
I fixed the issue in the latest nightly build. I reverted to gtk 4.6.0 and checked it works on debian 11. I will make a new release later today
- Tue Mar 22, 2022 5:52 pm
- Forum: Recorders & Sequencers
- Topic: Z-curious... anybody using Zrythm for actual production?
- Replies: 80
- Views: 29816
Re: Z-curious... anybody using Zrythm for actual production?
Oh-oh.. Problem already, I installed the Deb for Debian Bullseye (11) in AVL-MXE 21 and I pulled in the dependencies but I'm getting a terminal error: zrythm: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/zrythm/libgtk-4.so.1: undefined symbol: wl_proxy_marshal_flags Anyone else using it on Debian...
- Tue Mar 22, 2022 1:01 pm
- Forum: Recorders & Sequencers
- Topic: Z-curious... anybody using Zrythm for actual production?
- Replies: 80
- Views: 29816
Re: Z-curious... anybody using Zrythm for actual production?
Do you mind bug reports from distro packagers? I know some people who sell FLOSS see themselves as selling support and aprioristically dislike bug reports for unofficial builds but I personally think that by linking against bleeding-edge libraries (as we do on openSUSE Tumbleweed, rolling distro) c...
- Tue Mar 22, 2022 12:04 pm
- Forum: Recorders & Sequencers
- Topic: Z-curious... anybody using Zrythm for actual production?
- Replies: 80
- Views: 29816
Re: Z-curious... anybody using Zrythm for actual production?
Hi, stumbled upon this in an online search is it usable for production? The project format is stable now and there are no major issues being reported so I'd say so. The stuff remaining for v1 are minor things (mostly graphical) For Debian (MX Linux and AV Linux) is a problem try to use zrythm, 'coz ...
- Tue Mar 22, 2022 11:26 am
- Forum: Developer's Section
- Topic: Open interchangeable format for DAW sessions? Instawin for FLOSS!
- Replies: 6
- Views: 16615
Re: Open interchangeable format for DAW sessions? Instawin for FLOSS!
Wow, this is very cool, especially that they licensed it as MIT! I am usually a copyleft kind of person but for open standards permissive licenses are the way to go Note that from the permissive licenses, only Apache gives you a patent license. This is why GNU/FSF recommend Apache if you want to us...
- Sat May 15, 2021 5:55 pm
- Forum: Developer's Section
- Topic: Open interchangeable format for DAW sessions? Instawin for FLOSS!
- Replies: 6
- Views: 16615
Re: Open interchangeable format for DAW sessions? Instawin for FLOSS!
I think something like this would be great, iirc Paul mentioned opentimelineIO in one of his interviews https://github.com/PixarAnimationStudios/OpenTimelineIO
I don't see a C API anywhere though
I don't see a C API anywhere though