Search found 44 matches

by progwolff
Thu Apr 19, 2018 4:21 pm
Forum: Recorders & Sequencers
Topic: Progwolff Performer on Ubuntu
Replies: 10
Views: 6336

Re: Progwolff Performer on Ubuntu

Hi millenniloon, sorry for the late reply. Have been away from this forum for a while... Failed to find "GL/gl.h" in "/usr/include/libdrm" indicates that you need to install a package that ships "gl.h". If I'm not wrong, this is "mesa-common-dev" on Ubuntu/Mint. So, this should do the trick: sudo ap...
by progwolff
Fri Apr 14, 2017 12:38 pm
Forum: Recorders & Sequencers
Topic: Live performance with Midi keyboard
Replies: 37
Views: 18524

Re: Live performance with Midi keyboard

I just added a package for AV Linux: https://github.com/progwolff/performer/ ... VLinux.deb

Just install it with

Code: Select all

dpkg -i Performer-1.0.1-AVLinux.deb
by progwolff
Thu Apr 13, 2017 3:59 pm
Forum: Recorders & Sequencers
Topic: Live performance with Midi keyboard
Replies: 37
Views: 18524

Re: Live performance with Midi keyboard

Actually it's

Code: Select all

git clone https://github.com/progwolff/performer
cd performer
mkdir build
cd build
cmake -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=/usr ..
cmake .. means "call cmake on the CMakeLists.txt in directory '..' ".
by progwolff
Wed Apr 05, 2017 8:33 am
Forum: Recorders & Sequencers
Topic: App for playing live shows
Replies: 6
Views: 3584

Re: App for playing live shows

You might also give this a try: https://github.com/progwolff/performer I wrote this primarily for myself and have only little feedback from others. Some seem to have problems compiling it on older distros, but once running it should be stable (and it will also recover crashed plugins). https://linux...
by progwolff
Mon Mar 13, 2017 8:54 am
Forum: System Tuning and Configuration
Topic: Significant performance drop in WineASIO/REAPER vs. Ardour; any advice is appreciated.
Replies: 5
Views: 3242

Re: Significant performance drop in WineASIO/REAPER vs. Ardour; any advice is appreciated.

Reaper.exe has a very high priority, nearly as high as jackdbus. This does not mean that the audio of Reaper is processed with low latency (jack is responsible for this). It means that everything Reaper does, like (user interaction, displaying things, ...) will be executed with this priority and pos...
by progwolff
Sun Mar 12, 2017 9:58 am
Forum: System Tuning and Configuration
Topic: Significant performance drop in WineASIO/REAPER vs. Ardour; any advice is appreciated.
Replies: 5
Views: 3242

Re: Significant performance drop in WineASIO/REAPER vs. Ardour; any advice is appreciated.

Please give us the output of the following command while Reaper is running. echo "PRI"$'\t'"NICE"$'\t'"RTPRI"$'\t'"COMMAND"; for pid in $(grep -oP '.*/task/[0-9]*' <<< $(ls -R /proc/ 2>/dev/null) | sort -u); do awk 'BEGIN {FS="[ \t]+"}; {print $18 "\t" $19 "\t" $40 "\t" $2}' $pid/stat 2>/dev/null; d...
by progwolff
Sat Mar 11, 2017 11:19 am
Forum: System Tuning and Configuration
Topic: Significant performance drop in WineASIO/REAPER vs. Ardour; any advice is appreciated.
Replies: 5
Views: 3242

Re: Significant performance drop in WineASIO/REAPER vs. Ardour; any advice is appreciated.

Wine: Staging w/ RT priority.
What do you mean with that? You should not run wine (or any other application) with RT priority. This would inhibit jack from running at low latency and instead give the GUI of Reaper highest priority.
by progwolff
Fri Mar 03, 2017 10:12 am
Forum: System Tuning and Configuration
Topic: linux-rt, linux-rt-lts, linux-lqx(Liquorix) and linux-rt-bfq, which is the best?...
Replies: 26
Views: 15545

Re: linux-rt, linux-rt-lts, linux-lqx(Liquorix) and linux-rt-bfq, which is the best?...

Like sysrqer said, it highly depends on the machine and on the configuration of your system. Just changing the kernel and keeping other configs which were optimized against the old kernel will always lead to bad results. My requirements are also quite different than yours. I rarely do any recording,...
by progwolff
Thu Mar 02, 2017 1:17 pm
Forum: System Tuning and Configuration
Topic: linux-rt, linux-rt-lts, linux-lqx(Liquorix) and linux-rt-bfq, which is the best?...
Replies: 26
Views: 15545

Re: linux-rt, linux-rt-lts, linux-lqx(Liquorix) and linux-rt-bfq, which is the best?...

As I use the same computer for audio and daily work ( including programming for different operating systems and hardware development ), I decided to have localmodconfig disabled. It seems a little strange to me that this could improve the responsiveness. The modules loaded at runtime should be the s...
by progwolff
Thu Mar 02, 2017 12:45 pm
Forum: System Tuning and Configuration
Topic: linux-rt, linux-rt-lts, linux-lqx(Liquorix) and linux-rt-bfq, which is the best?...
Replies: 26
Views: 15545

Re: linux-rt, linux-rt-lts, linux-lqx(Liquorix) and linux-rt-bfq, which is the best?...

My config is attached. Might not be optimal though; I didn't look into it for some time now... Minimum latency is depending on the plugins in use... 48kHz with a buffer size of 64, 3 periods/buffer using a Scarlett 2i4 on an Intel i7-6700HQ are possible. When I get home, I will measure the roundtrip...
by progwolff
Thu Mar 02, 2017 10:19 am
Forum: System Tuning and Configuration
Topic: linux-rt, linux-rt-lts, linux-lqx(Liquorix) and linux-rt-bfq, which is the best?...
Replies: 26
Views: 15545

Re: linux-rt, linux-rt-lts, linux-lqx(Liquorix) and linux-rt-bfq, which is the best?...

I made good experiences with linux-ck (with some config changes) on Arch Linux.
Runs smoother than rt with zero xruns and less configuration effort (on my fairly new machine). Never tried Liquorix.
by progwolff
Tue Feb 28, 2017 2:43 pm
Forum: Recorders & Sequencers
Topic: Progwolff Performer on Ubuntu
Replies: 10
Views: 6336

Re: Progwolff Performer on Ubuntu

If someone is still interested: I added a Debian package for KXStudio at https://github.com/progwolff/performer/releases Install it with sudo dpkg -i Performer-KXStudio-1.0.1.deb With this package you don't need Qt5 libs, but no document viewer is enabled. If you want a document viewer to be enabled...
by progwolff
Wed Feb 08, 2017 3:30 pm
Forum: Computer Related Hardware
Topic: Tascam US-122Mkii Not supported-True?
Replies: 11
Views: 7061

Re: Tascam US-122Mkii Not supported-True?

snd_usb_audio is active.

As I said, you will need to blacklist snd_usb_audio.
by progwolff
Tue Feb 07, 2017 9:34 am
Forum: Computer Related Hardware
Topic: Tascam US-122Mkii Not supported-True?
Replies: 11
Views: 7061

Re: Tascam US-122Mkii Not supported-True?

Prsman wrote:What and where do I put into the asoundrc file? Thanks.
Just put it to ~/.asoundrc (which expands to /home/$USER/.asoundrc)
by progwolff
Mon Feb 06, 2017 11:35 am
Forum: Computer Related Hardware
Topic: Tascam US-122Mkii Not supported-True?
Replies: 11
Views: 7061

Re: Tascam US-122Mkii Not supported-True?

I just got my hands on my old Tascam US 122mkII. Using Arch Linux 4.9.4-1-ck, these are the steps how I got the audio inputs working: Blacklist snd_usb_audio. For this, add the line blacklist snd_usb_audio to /etc/modprobe.d/50-blacklist.conf. Reboot your system. Plug in the Tascam interface. cat /p...