LinuxMusicians

jonetsu wrote:We can also question why is that so many well-known artists have recorded on Harrison 32C consoles. Has coincidence played a substantial role instead of sound quality alone ?

I suspect the skill of the engineers and producers had more to do with it than the console specifically.

So they've taken the trouble to emulate a full 32C EQ circuit down to the resistors and capacitors and it results in a largely identical sound ? I don't think that's what it hints at at all. It's saying that if you play a track in mixbus and ardour at exactly the same time ... The word 'ardour' (or...

"In both products, the channelstrip EQ is "always in circuit" ... meaning the signal is always passing through the math, ( bypass simply means that the gain for the EQs is set to "0" ). In practice, if the EQs are both set flat or bypassed, the difference should be vanishin...

That's probably a fair conclusion but very much dependent on your needs and how you get on with the way they do midi. I think it's pretty good overall but there are some significant bugs when it comes to looping midi. There are high hopes for ardour 6 to address these problems but apparently it invo...

On the subject of mixbus vs ardour, it's true that mixbus offers a lot of nice additional features but I don't think it should be viewed as ardour pro as such or even better necessarily, it has some serious drawbacks when it comes to routing that ardour does not suffer. As far as I can tell the mixb...

Yeh I'm not against using multiple programs. I've considered using Harrsion Mixbus just for mixing but I just like to do it all in one program. One of the reasons for that is so that if I wanted to play live from my project, it's already a finished song and will sound good live, otherwise I'll only...

What is it that this tool did that you need? There might be alternatives or other ways.

I've also tried Renoise. Trackers aren't really my thing unless it's just some novelty fun I'm after, but it does do its job very well. But yeh, looks like you take that different programs for different stages of production approach which I mentioned. Seems so common amongst Linux users.. I would p...

I think ardour keeps a .bak version of the project so you could try renaming that and opening it. I would backup the whole project folder first though.

I tend to have two stages of the music I make, making and mixing the music, and then editing and mixing vocals. I have always used renoise for the music, for me it's very creative and I like the amount of modulation that's possible, control of details that you can have, the native fx, and the stabil...

Fair enough. I suppose that consideration being secondary is even more relevant in linux with all the talk of things being free.

Wow, that looks really cool. I can't comment about libraries and such but I'd certainly be interested in trying it.

one of the most frequent things I hear is "I wish I'd tried these sooner..." - Which brings us back to advertising and social media - if they had seen the software earlier then I expect they would have tried it earlier. I don't think it is fair for you to say that people are unwilling to ...

I think you should become active on twitter and instagram, it's hard to deny the power of free advertising they have. I've just had a look on twitter and there are mentions in many different languages of your products. Perhaps make some videos and put them on a youtube channel to showcase why your p...

Well I think it is one thing to talk of linux and another to talk of FOSS. I have seen video tutorials of Windows people using Helm, puredata, vcvrack. If the tools are good enough then they will be used but the truth is that a lot of them are not as good (or as easy to use) as the leading commercia...