Check this:
viewtopic.php?f=44&t=2545&p=11061#p11061
My first LMMS Hack
Moderators: raboof, khz, MattKingUSA
studio32 wrote:epichord http://evanr.infinitymotel.net/epichord/
GMaq wrote:falkTX,
I'm the maintainer of AV Linux, since there is so much noise about Lucid I thought I'd better check it out. I installed it in VBox and added the -rt Kernel, medibuntu and your repo...DONE!
This is an uprecedented collection of current Audio apps in a single repo, great work, I wish you all the success with your KXStudio, you are correct that KDE is not represented with a good Multimedia specific version so that is a niche to be filled. I think there is room for everyone and of course I believe AV Linux also has a place.
As someone who knows how much work this takes I just had to say what a great job you're doing! I look forward to seeing an official KXStudio announcement soon.
alberto wrote:Congratulations for this excellent PPA.
I think there is a bug in eq10q-lv2 package. It doesn't install anything. I'm using a 64 bit system.
AutoStatic wrote:Hi falkTX,
A note of criticism from my side, my apologies beforehand
I wanted to backport some of your packages for my Karmic PPA. But your just so far from being meticulous that I have to refrain from backporting anything because it will take me so much time to take care of all the lintian warnings
Directories containing .svn and .git control directories, maintainer name errors, copyright errors etc., stuff like that. Nothing really seriously wrong but to me as a "mierenneuker" (nitpicker) it all seems so sloppy.
My apologies again for criticising your hard work but I had to get this off my chest.
Best,
Jeremy
Yes I have, I backported some stuff for my Fedora machines at work so I know how to package RPM's and to what rules they have to comply (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_c ... _and_rules). I agree that packaging for Fedora is more straightforward.falkTX wrote:I think that the debian policy has too many rules... (have you look at a "debian/rules" for Fedora or ArchLinux?)
I'm far from a good packager either, I just package the stuff I need and am not claiming anything either. But those packaging rules and guidelines don't exist for nothing, but that's another discussion, one we shouldn't keep here.falkTX wrote:I'm sorry if my packages aren't the best ones around, but I honestly don't care, cause the users don't care about the copyright/lintian stuff, they just want it to work.
WINERT=10 wine blabla.exe
export WINERT=10
setenv WINERT 10
thorgal wrote:I have not tried it myself but I suppose the number goes from 0 to 100 (RT watchdog being at 99 usually, jack somewhere between 10 and 70, etc).
As to the WINERT, it looks like a environment variable, so you would need to set it before calling wine:
- Code: Select all
WINERT=10 wine blabla.exe
or you can have it in some login / shell init script
bash:
- Code: Select all
export WINERT=10
csh family
- Code: Select all
setenv WINERT 10
mind you, any wine app using RT SCHED_FIFO threads would then use this scheduling priority level.
Return to New Linux Music News
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest